ADVERTISING: When the Marketing Reach of Social Media Backfires What happens when behavior on social media is deemed antisocial? Full story here.
A blog relating to Internet legal issues by Professor John Swinson, University of Queensland
Adsense HTML
Marketing Issues with Social Media
Social Networks Seminar
Together they will take a look at the role social media is playing in bringing about true democracy, challenging conventional economies and helping the scientific community accelerate research."
The Evolving Mission of Google
THE MEDIA EQUATION: The Evolving Mission of Google Google will tell you insistently that it is not a media company — it organizes and manages content, but does not produce it. Watch closely. See NY Times article
Privacy - Week 4
Office of Australian Information Commissioner - look at the Privacy Act and Privacy Principles.
What legislative changes have been proposed for Australian privacy laws?
You should also be aware of relevant case law in this area - is there a right to privacy at common law?
Privacy Foundation
International rights
Art 17 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Privacy Policies
Do you understand/agree to all of these terms?
Amazon
Disney
Cookies
Cookie Central
Google Maps
Legal responses - Australia; USA; Czech Republic; Germany. What are some other responses from around the world, particularly in relation to the Street View data collection issue?
No longer a social norm?
Solutions
TrustE
Keyword Decision in California
Given the nature of the alleged infringement here, the most relevant factors to the analysis of the likelihood of con- fusion are: (1) the strength of the mark; (2) the evidence of actual confusion; (3) the type of goods and degree of care likely to be exercised by the purchaser; and (4) the labeling and appearance of the advertisements and the surrounding context on the screen displaying the results page.
The district court did not weigh the Sleekcraft factors flexibly to match the specific facts of this case. It relied on the Internet “troika,” which is highly illuminating in the context of domain names, but which fails to discern whether there is a likelihood of confusion in a keywords case. Because the linchpin of trademark infringement is consumer confusion, the district court abused its discretion in issuing the injunction. "
Class 3 - Internet Jurisdiction
- Background: The Australian
- Australian Trial Judge Decision
- Full Court of Federal Court Decision
- Note regarding US decision on jurisdiction
Australian Domain Names
UDRP - Bad Faith Registration
Keywords in Canada
iCyte
Week 2 - Google and Social Media
What are the risks of doing business with these organisations?
For some background you can look at:
Don't Be Evil
Google Product Offerings
Google Watch
Google Book Project
AdWords - Australia
Facebook and Privacy
Click fraud
Endorsements - US position
Study guides
Article on Domain Name Law
7s Domain Name Decision
Patenting Business Methods
Review of patentable subject matter in Australia
The Australian Advisory Council on Intellectual Property has released its review of patentable subject matter. The Advisory Council is an independent body appointed by the government, and advises the Federal Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research on intellectual property matters.
Click here to view the report
Click here to view the Advisory Council's Media Release
Copyright in databases
iiNet copyright case - Full Federal Court Appeal Decision
Google Modifies Its Algorithm
Fined For Conduct of Facebook Fans
In his judgment Justice Finkelstein held that: "while it cannot be said that Allergy Pathway was responsible for the initial publication of testimonials (the original publisher was the third party who posted the testimonials on Allergy Pathway's Twitter and Facebook pages) it is appropriate to conclude that Allergy Pathway accepted responsibility for the publications when it knew of them and decided not to remove them. Hence it became the publisher of the testimonials."
In responding to the judgment, ACCC chairman Graeme Samuel said: "Many corporations now use Facebook "Fan" pages and Twitter accounts to promote their businesses. This outcome confirms that any business that decides to leave public testimonials or other comments on their Facebook and Twitter pages will be held responsible if they are false, misleading or deceptive."
ACCC v. Allergy Pathway [2011] FCA 74
Use of Domain Names is Passing Off - UK Decision
Keywords abuse - damages of $292,000
Internet Law Resource Centre
Manipulating Google Search Results
LWN117 Offered in Semester 1, 2011
Is Law School A Losing Game?
How should damages be assessed for privacy and cybersecurity breaches
Listen to this podcast where I discuss how damages should be assessed in privacy and cybersecurity lawsuits. The Lawyers Weekly Show host J...
-
The United Nations intellectual property agency (WIPO) is the latest front in the US-China trade war. http://www.theage.com.au/world/sad-am...
-
The issue of content regulation in China was mentioned in this blog last year . In the last few weeks, this issue has once again pushed into...
-
Finally, what is called direct registration of domain names is coming to Australia. See https://www.auda.org.au/statement/australias-interne...