This is a really good website and article on Digital Disruption. It is from BCG.
A blog relating to Internet legal issues by Professor John Swinson, University of Queensland
Adsense HTML
Consequential Loss After Hacking Decision from the USA
An interesting decision from the United States (11th Circuit appeals court) in Silvertop Systems -- decision here.
There is an interesting discussion of consequential loss, that starts at the heading "LMT's Counterclaim for Breach of Contract"
Facts were these:
·
Supplier
(Silverpop) provided an email marketing service. Customers loaded up
email addresses and Supplier would send out mass emails in a form
specified by the customer
to addresses on the list.
·
Hackers got into the Supplier’s system and got access to several customer’s marketing lists, including LMT’s list.
·
The
contract between Silverpop and LMT had a confidentiality clause
(obligation to protect the list against unauthorised disclosure to third
parties) and an exclusion
of consequential loss.
·
Amongst
the claims and counterclaims, was a claim from LMT that Silverpop had
breached the confidentiality obligation and that the damage suffered by
LMT was the sale
value of the marketing list, which they said was now worthless.
Discount Accommodation and Affiliate Payments
Online travel agents make commissions of approximately 15% to 25% of the price of the accommodation booked. Some share that commission with travellers through loyalty programs. Others give discounts upfront, or share some of the commission with "affiliates" who refer other customers. One such service is JetSetter, who has discount quality accommodation, and shares 5% with the guest and 5% with the referring affiliate. See Jetsetter. (I use this service by the way, and it is good. I have stayed in luxury accommodation at great prices.)
Another good referral program is OFX (OzForex) which is an international wire money transfer business. It is in competition with Western Union, and is much better value. See OFX website.
Another good referral program is OFX (OzForex) which is an international wire money transfer business. It is in competition with Western Union, and is much better value. See OFX website.
Echo from Amazon
The relatively new Echo device from Amazon is getting great press. It will be interesting to see what legal issues arise from a voice controlled device in your home that connects with other systems.
There is also the new Amazon Tap.
Any why is Amazon opening physical book stores?
There is also the new Amazon Tap.
Any why is Amazon opening physical book stores?
Megatrends for a Digitally Enabled Workforce
CSIRO have collaborated with Data 61, BCG & ACS in relation to predicting the megatrends for a digitally enabled workforce. Interesting reading... http://www.csiro.au/en/Research/D61/Areas/Data-for-decisions/Strategic-Foresight/Tomorrows-Digitally-Enabled-Workforce
Apple v The Government
If you are following the Apple v US Government legal process
over the FBI request to brute force break of the passcode on Syed
Farook’s work phone, the link below
has a good summary and also a link to the 65 page motion.
Copyright in Instagram Photos
See this article regarding a copyright claim in respect of Instagram photos.
Story here.
I have met a number of people who are earning good money promoting products on Instagram and on blogs.
Story here.
I have met a number of people who are earning good money promoting products on Instagram and on blogs.
Business Method Patents In Australia
After a long delay, the Australian Federal Court (Appeals Division) has finally decided the case of Commissioner of Patents v RPL Central Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 177. This is an appeal from an appeal from a decision by the Commissioner of Patents not to grant a patent to a method and system for computerised collection of information relevant to assessment of a person’s competency for a recognised qualification standard.
The case considered whether this invention was patentable subject matter in Australia.
The Court decided that this invention was not patentable subject matter in Australian.
See also IP Whiteboard
The case considered whether this invention was patentable subject matter in Australia.
The Court decided that this invention was not patentable subject matter in Australian.
"A claimed invention must be examined to ascertain whether it is in substance a scheme or plan or whether it can broadly be described as an improvement in computer technology. The basis for the analysis starts with the fact that a business method, or mere scheme, is not, per se, patentable. The fact that it is a scheme or business method does not exclude it from properly being the subject of letters patent, but it must be more than that. There must be more than an abstract idea; it must involve the creation of an artificial state of affairs where the computer is integral to the invention, rather than a mere tool in which the invention is performed. Where the claimed invention is to a computerised business method, the invention must lie in that computerisation. It is not a patentable invention simply to “put” a business method “into” a computer to implement the business method using the computer for its well- known and understood functions.
Is the mere implementation of an abstract idea in a well-known machine sufficient to render patentable subject matter? Is the artificial effect that arises, because information is stored in RAM and there is communication over the Internet or wifi, sufficient? Does any physical effect give rise to a manner of manufacture? Are the mere presence of an artificial effect and economic utility, without more, sufficient to determine manner of manufacture?
... it is apparent that, other than the integers providing that the computer processes the criteria to generate corresponding questions and presents those questions to the user, the method does not include any steps that are outside the normal use of a computer. It is not suggested that the creation of the plurality of assessable criteria themselves form the basis of the claimed invention. They are present on the NTIS website from which they are retrieved. It is not suggested that the presentation of the questions or the processing of the user’s responses involve ingenuity themselves or that this constitutes the requisite manner of manufacture.
We conclude that the claimed invention is to a scheme or a business method that is not properly the subject of letters patent."
See also IP Whiteboard
Personal Information
The Australian Administrative Appeals Tribunal has decided that companies who collect operational data about services they provide
to individual end users, is not personal information about customers.
See Telstra Corporation Limited and Privacy Commissioner [2015] AATA 99 (18 December 2015)
See Telstra Corporation Limited and Privacy Commissioner [2015] AATA 99 (18 December 2015)
The Advocate Defames The Bank on Social Media
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
How should damages be assessed for privacy and cybersecurity breaches
Listen to this podcast where I discuss how damages should be assessed in privacy and cybersecurity lawsuits. The Lawyers Weekly Show host J...
-
The United Nations intellectual property agency (WIPO) is the latest front in the US-China trade war. http://www.theage.com.au/world/sad-am...
-
The issue of content regulation in China was mentioned in this blog last year . In the last few weeks, this issue has once again pushed into...
-
Finally, what is called direct registration of domain names is coming to Australia. See https://www.auda.org.au/statement/australias-interne...