Today, the High Court of Australia decided that Google must go to trial to determine whether Google is liable for defamation regarding its display of search engine results and also in respect of Google's autocomplete function.
See KWM article Google this: The High Court allows Google to be sued for defamation
See Sydney Morning Herald article
See HCA judgment Trkulja v Google LLC [2018] HCA 25
A blog relating to Internet legal issues by Professor John Swinson, University of Queensland
Adsense HTML
.au Domain Names - Policy Review
auDA has constituted a policy review panel to review virtually all domain name policies in Australia, as well as to recommend a policy to implement direct registration in Australia. I am chair of this policy review panel.
See https://www.auda.org.au/policies/panels-and-committees/2017-policy-review-panel/
I strongly urge you to review the issues papers and to provide feedback.
Direct registration will allow registration of domain names in Australia such as cyberspace.au.
There are other reforms being discussed. See the Issues Paper that was published at the end of January.
See https://www.auda.org.au/policies/panels-and-committees/2017-policy-review-panel/
I strongly urge you to review the issues papers and to provide feedback.
Direct registration will allow registration of domain names in Australia such as cyberspace.au.
There are other reforms being discussed. See the Issues Paper that was published at the end of January.
Liability of Intermediaries for copyright infringement
At the end of last year, the Federal Court of Australia issued a judgment in against the Redbubble platform, in favour of Pokemon.
The judgment is here: Pokémon Company International, Inc. v Redbubble Ltd [2017] FCA 154
This is an important copyright and consumer protection law case. Redbubble recently appealed (and its seems that their appeal was lodged outside of the appeal window).
There is also a similar case pending, involving the Hell's Angels.
A good summary is located on the IP Whiteboard blog.
The judgment is here: Pokémon Company International, Inc. v Redbubble Ltd [2017] FCA 154
This is an important copyright and consumer protection law case. Redbubble recently appealed (and its seems that their appeal was lodged outside of the appeal window).
There is also a similar case pending, involving the Hell's Angels.
A good summary is located on the IP Whiteboard blog.
Canadian Update
This blog post has a good summary of relevant legal developments in Canada over the past year.
https://www.canadiantechlawblog.com/2018/01/17/technology-law-highlights-2017-year-in-review/
https://www.canadiantechlawblog.com/2018/01/17/technology-law-highlights-2017-year-in-review/
Google Found Responsible for Defamation
The South Australian Full Court decided against Google Inc. in the recent case of Google v. Duffy. See http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/sa/SASCFC/2017/130.html
Google's search results included defamatory material. Google was found to be a secondary publisher.
Case note here.
Google's search results included defamatory material. Google was found to be a secondary publisher.
Case note here.
AirBNB Hell
An interesting website that points out the risks of using AirBNB for both hosts and guests, www.airbnbhell.com
Digital Watermarks on Printed Documents
"The question is how the government identified her so quickly, and the answer may be that she was inadvertently outed by the Intercept itself. That’s because the website posted an image of the leaked document containing an almost-invisible code applied by the printer that produced the document sent to the Intercept. The digital watermark identified the printer model and serial number, along with the time and date then document was printed out."
See LA Times
See LA Times
Meriton found guilty of manipulating TripAdvisor Reviews
Serviced apartment and hotel operator Meriton was found to have engaged in illegal conduct by manipulating TripAdvisor reviews. The ACCC sued Meriton and won. The ACCC brought actions under s18 and the little used s34 of the Australian Consumer Law.
See judgment at: http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2017/2017fca1305
According to the judgment, Meriton manipulated TripAdvisor in two ways:
See judgment at: http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2017/2017fca1305
According to the judgment, Meriton manipulated TripAdvisor in two ways:
"The respondent (Meriton) conducts a business of offering serviced apartment accommodation at (at least) 13 properties in Queensland and New South Wales. These properties appear on the TripAdvisor website. During the period November 2014 to October 2015 (the relevant period), Meriton participated in the Review Express service offered by TripAdvisor. On a weekly basis, Meriton provided TripAdvisor with the email addresses of guests who had stayed at its properties and TripAdvisor sent email invitations to these guests to post a review. However, rather than sending TripAdvisor the email addresses of all guests who had stayed at its properties (other than those who had requested that their details not be provided), Meriton adopted the following two practices:
(a) The first practice was to add the letters “MSA” (which stand for Meriton Serviced Apartments) to the front of the email addresses of certain guests. This rendered the email address invalid. This practice was applied to guests who had made a complaint or were otherwise considered likely to have had a negative experience at a Meriton property. I will refer to this practice as the MSA-masking practice.
(b) The second practice was to withhold from TripAdvisor the email addresses of all the guests who had stayed at a property during a period of time when there had been a major service disruption (such as the lifts not working, no hot water, etc). I will refer to this practice as the bulk withholding practice."
Alleged Illegal Conduct by Apple
Apple is being sued in Australia by the ACCC in relation to the Error 53 software fault in iPhones. When this fault bricked iPhones and iPads, Apple refused to fix the problem where third parties had done prior repairs.
The latest judgment on a procedural motion is http://www.judgments.fedcourt .gov.au/judgments/Judgments/ fca/single/2017/2017fca1329
The latest judgment on a procedural motion is http://www.judgments.fedcourt
Regulation of Automated Vehicles in Australia
The Australian National Transport Commission has released a discussion paper
Regulatory options to assure automated vehicle safety in Australia. The paper identifies 4 regulatory options for a safety assurance system for automated vehicle technology.
Submissions for this discussion paper are open until 4pm, Friday, 28 July 2017.
The NTC expects to present it preferred regulatory option to the Minister in November 2017.
Full
media release.
Metatags and Google advertisements found to be trademark infringements
In an appeal decision handed down on Friday, the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia has affirmed a trial judge's decision that metatags and Google advertisements were trademark infringements.
The case is Accor Australia & New Zealand Hospitality Pty Ltd v Liv Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 56.
The case concerned a real estate agent advertising short term accommodation, using the name of a nearby Accor hotel (which was a registered trademark) to attract Internet users to the real estate agent's booking website.
The court confirmed findings of the trial judge that the following were trademark uses and trademark infringements: use of of the trademark in the domain name, use in metatags for the website, use in headings for the website, use in email addresses, and use in Google advertisements.
The case is Accor Australia & New Zealand Hospitality Pty Ltd v Liv Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 56.
The case concerned a real estate agent advertising short term accommodation, using the name of a nearby Accor hotel (which was a registered trademark) to attract Internet users to the real estate agent's booking website.
The court confirmed findings of the trial judge that the following were trademark uses and trademark infringements: use of of the trademark in the domain name, use in metatags for the website, use in headings for the website, use in email addresses, and use in Google advertisements.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
How should damages be assessed for privacy and cybersecurity breaches
Listen to this podcast where I discuss how damages should be assessed in privacy and cybersecurity lawsuits. The Lawyers Weekly Show host J...
-
The United Nations intellectual property agency (WIPO) is the latest front in the US-China trade war. http://www.theage.com.au/world/sad-am...
-
The issue of content regulation in China was mentioned in this blog last year . In the last few weeks, this issue has once again pushed into...
-
Finally, what is called direct registration of domain names is coming to Australia. See https://www.auda.org.au/statement/australias-interne...